Jump to content

mark poulson

TU Sponsor
  • Posts

    14,726
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    364

Everything posted by mark poulson

  1. I'm guessing the licensing fee is pretty big, so they had to pick a mold that would be sure to sell, and they did.
  2. Kajan, There used to be a video of a pot stirring system (I think it was with presto pot) in action here, but I can't find it now. Do you have a link?
  3. When I used to use oil-based rattle can paints on my one piece douglas fir Punker-style baits, they were bullet proof, too. But I've gotten spoiled with PVC. No sealing, no priming, no water intrusion, no worries about top coat failure, all of the things that brought me an extra level of grief. Now I just concentrate on making a lure that actually catches fish!
  4. Mazel Tov! You're doomed now. Hahaha
  5. Sooo....do you think putting a floating line tie on an unstable bait would make it stable? Would it achieve an erratic action? Inquiring minds want to know! Hahaha I don't think a floating line tie will do much for a shallow running square bill, since the line tie is in the lure body, and not on the bill itself. But I'm thinking that a floating line tie will be on my next deeper diving crank, so I don't have to worry about tuning it. Also, it will remove what is always a building pain for me, coating the line tie wire with D2T from the lure body up through the hole in the bill. I'm lazy, too, and all about getting a lure into the water as quickly as possible.
  6. mark poulson

    roach glider 3

    I never know exactly how much ballast to add until I've got the lure finished. I'm just not that smart. But being able to play with the ballast without worrying about water intrusion is one of the things I like most about AZEK. For your poplar bait, if you know where you want to add your ballast, you can drill extra ballast holes, seal everything real well, add all the hardware and hooks, and then hang egg sinkers and/or split shot onto your belly hook until you get the float/sink you want. I use 1/4" lead wire, so a clean 1/4" hole works for me. I weigh the sinkers to see how much ballast I need, cut of that amount of lead wire, and, in the case of the Roach, put it into the two holes I had predrilled. Once I had foiled and top coated it, I had to drill out about 3/4gram to get it to sink really slowly. I filled the open 3/16" hole I had drilled with paper towel, twisted thin and masked in, then added a couple of drops of super glue to seal and fill the hole, shot it with some accelerant (I'm not patient) and tested it again. Now I know, for the next Roach I make, to take that amount off the ballast before I foil and top coat it. If it still isn't right, I can always drill out more, or add a little thin lead wire around the front treble hook shank, and anchor it with super glue, too. Keeping the ballast centered in the bait so it sits or sinks level is important. You may need to allow more or less weight for you ballast, depending on how you plan to finish and top coat your lure. Just be sure to make notes that you can refer to later.
  7. mark poulson

    roach glider 3

    Bill, It carves easily with a sharp knife. It machines just like wood, except that it gets hot and melts with dull blades, and the sanding dust is electrostatically charged, so it sticks to everything, and raises hell with sinuses. I wear a dust mask whenever I sand it. I cut out my rectangular blanks with a radial arm or chop saw, cut out my profiles and make my lip slots on a band saw, and shape my baits on an oscillating belt sander. I carve my details with a sharp exacto or other knife, use a drill press to make my ballast holes and eye indentations, and a cordless drill for pilot holes for my hook hangers and line ties. It's the same basic process I used to use with wood, except I can design, shape, finish, and fish a lure in one day, thanks to Solarez UV cured resin.
  8. Man, I had forgotten how complicated sealing and waterproofing wooden baits can be!
  9. My guess it that it is a quieter bait than it would be if it were hollow plastic. And, with the balsa inside, it would have a higher center of gravity, so it would roll more. With their internal paint scheme that would increase flash, especially when it's trolled. Other than that, I don't see any advantage over hollow plastic.
  10. mark poulson

    roach glider 3

    Bill, One of the best things about using PVC is that I don't have to wait to see how it floats when I'm playing around with ballast. No sealing, no water worries. I add the hardware, and put it into a bucket of water to see how it floats, or, in this case, sinks, and how it sits in the water. I used to use poplar, too, but I quit because of water intrusion issues. I could never seal it well enough to keep the water out of my jointed swimbaits. When JR Hopkins suggested I try AZEK, I found I could use it for almost everything, including poppers, so I seldom use wood anymore. I used the AZEK trim board, which is the more buoyant of their materials. I could have used the decking, too, but I think the buoyancy of the trim board let me put more ballast deeper, so the bait is more stable and less inclined to roll. For me, the lighter the building material, the better, when I want an active bait, and their trim board is almost as light as balsa, but holds hardware like the screw eyes just fine.
  11. "Now the first 4 pounders are in order , Mark :wink:" From your lips to God's ear.... I made my glider with the same flat surfaces as the Roach. I did want a lure that didn't roll as much. Your point about the flat back surface leading to more diving makes sense. It looks to me like the Salmo has a rounded back section. So maybe some roll, along with the side to side action, wouldn't be a bad thing. Hmmm....
  12. My guess is you're right, that it would be that it reduces the uneven forces on the lure by moving farther way from the diving surface. Following along that line of reasoning, as you said, it would probably reduce the action (wobble) of the lure as well, but, since I have never seen one of my deep divers swimming at full depth, I can't really say what it does. They seem to have plenty of action when I pull them through the water next to the boat. Oh, well, another of life's little mysteries that will probably go unsolved! Hahaha
  13. mark poulson

    roach glider 3

    littleriver. Because I kept the Roach's flat sided design, it doesn't roll on the twitch. But, because it is only 3 1/2" long, it will almost walk in place if I twitch without taking up line at the same time. This resulted in fouling, because I was throwing it on 12 lb fluoro, which is what I had on the setup I took to test it. I plan to fish it on heavier (20 lb+) line when I take it out next time. That should cut down on the fouling, like it does with a spook or sammie. I made the drawing at my desk, with the finished lure in front of me, so I could post all the details more easily. I hope I remember where I eventually put the drawing. Hahaha
  14. mark poulson

    roach glider 3

    Dieter, I thought I was following the design pretty closely. I just tried to add whatever I've learned about keeping baits stable to the design. That's why I tapered the body from top to bottom, to make the belly less buoyant. I tapered from front to middle to back because I've found, with crankbaits and swimbaits, that livens the action of the bait, so I thought it might help my Roach turn and glide more easily. I kept the flat sides, like the Roach, because I didn't want the lure to roll on the twitch. I used the handle of a small screwdriver to add the scaling, first in one direction, and then at 90 degrees again. I got the idea from the video link you posted. Thank you. I did the scaling after I'd already foiled the bait. I couldn't figure out, if I scaled the foil first, how I would be able to burnish the foil onto the bait without ruining the scaling, so I waited until it was already applied and burnished. Fortunately, the BritBak foil has enough self- adhesive glue on the back to make it somewhat soft, and easy to scale once it's already installed. It's always fun to try a new lure design, and very satisfying when it actually works! Thanks again for the lure building site links.
  15. I think it would eliminate roll on deep divers, for sure. I've made them more stable by raising the line tie up higher above the surface of the diving lip. I made a taller loop on my wire, so it sits higher. That seems to help with lure stability, but I'm not sure why.
  16. Dieter, I agree, a stiffer line will cut down on the fouling. I typically use 20 lb braid for my topwater lures, with a 20 lb mono leader, to avoid fouling. Using a stiffer line with the glider, either fluoro or mono, will almost certainly help. I plan to try heavy mono to see if the thicker, more buoyant line helps keep it up on the glide. My Roach copy (thanks for the link) sinks level, very slowly. I think the sloped forehead acts as a diving bill on the pull. I'll probably make one that has a more or less flat back, to see if that helps it to glide without diving. Thanks for the Salmo video. I'll play around with a floater, but one that sits just barely at the surface, so it dives a little on the pull. The traditional Roach shape should work perfectly for that. I made this one with flat sides, tapered from the shoulders down, to make the belly less buoyant so it needed less ballast. It doesn't roll on the pull, but it is just as erratic as the Salmo on the video if I work it fast. I'll post more after I've incorporated all these new ideas in my next glider.
  17. Ben, I was just pulling your tail about the size of Texas threadfins. I usually solve the fouling by going to a stiffer (20 lb+) line. I just had 12 lb on my deep diver crankbait setup, so that's what I used for testing. I'll switch to stiffer line when I fish it, and the bluegill glider you sent me (thanks again). I think I'll try your magnet idea. It sounds like a good plan. Since this lure is ballasted "just right", I'll try it on the next one, if I remember! I have some magnets hanging over my work bench, clearing the air of those deadly charged particles that come streaming in from CME's on the Sun. Hahaha I'll probably see Mike Long at the Anglers Marine Bass-A-Thon later this month, and I'll ask him about how he fishes his gliders, and what size he uses.
  18. Man, you're a buzzkill! Hahaha Of course, you're right, I'll see them there, and, hopefully, you, too, but I don't recognized you handle, or know your name. PM me with it, if you would, so we can meet up there. If you've told me before, forgive me. CRS!
  19. The idea of a self-centering line tie made me curious how it was achieved, and how it actually self centered. What I reason is that, when the line tie is leaning toward one side, the other side of the lip has more surface area, and more resistance. So the lure moves away from that side, toward the side with less resistance. The line tie, since it is not anchored, would move toward the side of the lure with more lip surface, which would give it less surface area as the line tie passed the center of the lip. I'm guessing the line tie would settle in the center of the lip pretty quickly, evening out the forces on either side of the lip.
  20. I was able to get the gear to open the presto pot threads for me. Thanks.
  21. I don't know what they used, but it looks great! Rapala really knows how to make balsa baits, for sure. The Rapala site shows it swimming: http://www.rapala.com/BX-Swimmer/BX%20Swimmer,default,pd.html
  22. Well, I tested my silver Roach, and it worked! What a relief, since, in my usual impatient way, I went ahead and foiled it and finished it without swim testing it. Removing 3/4 gram from the ballast (30.9 grams down to 30.2) turned it from a fast sink to a just barely sink. I test swam it on 12lb fluoro. On long casts it sinks as it's walked back. I'm guessing it's something to do with the sloping forehead. I think a flatter back would keep it from going down on each twitch. I imagine it will stay up closer to the surface if I use nylon mono, too. I want it to fish for largemouth, so I made it small, like a mature threadfin shad. The don't get much bigger than 3 1/2" out here. I'm sure they're bigger than that in Texas, Ben. Hahaha It's 3 1/2" long, and, because it's so short it will turn 180 degrees+ on a hard pull, but it fouls itself if I use that hard a retrieve. So I walk it like a spook, with short twitches and reeling as I go, and it works just fine. I'm sure a longer bait would not foul itself as easily on longer pulls. I posted two pictures and more details in the Hard Baits gallery. I'm going to make one and paint it as a black crappie, and another as a bluegill, just for fun.
  23. Hahaha You're probably like me. I've got the second part of genieass down pat!
×
×
  • Create New...
Top