Jump to content

con3head

TU Member
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About con3head

  • Birthday 01/30/1985

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://chasingbaits.blogspot.de/

Recent Profile Visitors

426 profile views

con3head's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

1

Reputation

  1. Thanks for all the tips and tricks you shared, especially Thanks to "bass100"
  2. This is what i achieved so far, it has the dimensions of the slide swimmer 250 and has two ballastpositions same as the slideswimmer. i´m pretty happy now and hope the swim gets smoother after some mor detailwork on the hinges.
  3. does someone have a DEPS 250 slideswimmer? if you put it in the water, is the tailsection forcing to the surface??? or does both sections really fall equal? if so there must be a different density in the tailsection so there is no need to put ballast in to get it fall equal.
  4. douglas, i do not have any problems with one piece gliders or swimbaits with more than two sections! i know that these baits are different. the first just glides and the other swims, right? i´m talking about a 2-PIECE GLIDEBAIT, and the weighting in those. so your first post doesn´t help me or i´m missunderstanding you the hole time
  5. i undersand these things! free hinge weight equal falling at the same rate... horizontally... but, like you say you are weighting both of the TWO sections equal AND horizontally! this is not working when you say, do not use ballast in the tailsection, i don´t mean dierctly in the tail^^ i cant weight them equal and horizontally WITHOUT any ballast in the tailsection, because if i don´t, it sitting in the water nose down! the first section will be horizontally that way and the tailsection is forcing to the surface.... hope you understand what i´m trying to explain^^
  6. so i´m wondering, if the equal weighting to each section is that important??? because if the 250 slideswimmer has no weight in the tail section, it can´t be equal or maybe the density is more so it sinks without extra ballast???
  7. I did it like that just 0,5-1,0cm from the bottom
  8. this is exactly how it looks when i twitch!!!! have you found a way to get it work???
  9. i was also wondering with the deps 250, there are only 2 positions of ballast!!! nothing in the tailsection?
  10. update! 1. changing the ballast to the shown positions makes the movement a little bit mor stable but there is no smooth glide at all 2. changing the hinge system to pin and screweys has no effect on the movement! And when i twitch it is still moving to one side, i think the sides are to flat maybe? like that the high and flat side makes a massive waterresistence???!!!! I want a glide like the deps 250 slide swimmer and this one is swimming very wide and smooth from side to side, and if you twitch it, it turn immediatly like i can see.... so where is this magic happening????^^ should i grind of some from the top and bottom to make the bait thinner if you are looking from the side????
  11. This is exactly what i want from this baits!!! Thanks ironbass
  12. I inhaled Your thread before and know what happend
  13. just to explain what i want from this bait: it´s supposed to be a lure like the S-Waver or 3D bleak glide swimmer or the trick trout by hinkle lures! it is not going to be a glider like a Jerkbait with the typical ballast settings in front and rear like buster jerks (one piece), those i´ve done before succesfully....left to right and so on
  14. just to get it right i found a pic and added what type of hinge you want me to do^^ i just keep carving^^ but scales is something i ´m not patient enough carving just needs practise but bringing the bait alive is the key and the point i have to work on, jerkbaits style baits are easier (i did before)
×
×
  • Create New...
Top