no replies! Reason probably being is what’s in the claims is what actually matters. A patent lawyer would be the best way to decipher those claims. Sometimes patents are the most minimal feature/detail just to be able to swing around a patent schlong and scare people off.
I’m not a specialist at all but as far as fishing lure patents go, it’s a tough way to say because we are all inspired by previous works (ie. Flukes, lipless, swim bait etc) and at the root of it all we’re all copying a fish, crawfish, worm etc which all look very similar to each other (within it’s category).
As far as that fluke goes, it’s more than likely not the bait that invented the fluke and quite possibly not the first fluke with a patent on it.
Usually the most notable patents are patents that are more utilitarian/systemic concepts that have never existed before and revolutionized a process.
Unless you’re knocking off that fluke, I wouldn’t worry about it much.