mark poulson Posted October 15, 2017 Report Share Posted October 15, 2017 35 minutes ago, gliders said: Bob p, that's a method I use a lot on fry feeding trout and other predators over here, we call it fishing on the drop and I make patterns designed purely to be taken on the slow descent when predators crash into fry shoals and then pick off the stunned victims. That's exactly how a Duo Realis Spinbait 80 falls on a semi-slack line. It's slightly tail down, and wobbles side to side as it falls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gliders Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Had a look mark, interesting looking lure. These type of spin baits not really used over here, have toyed with some experimenting with spin props.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speckledtroutfish Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 Does the test work with brackish or ocean water? Will the salt skew the results? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark poulson Posted February 16, 2020 Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 On 10/16/2017 at 5:09 PM, gliders said: Had a look mark, interesting looking lure. These type of spin baits not really used over here, have toyed with some experimenting with spin props.. I bet they'd work on both trout and salmon. Those fish eat other fish, bigtime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodkaman Posted February 16, 2020 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2020 (edited) Speckledtroutfish - you would have to apply an adjustment factor. Sea water has a density of 1.025. As for brackish water, the density is likely to be variable depending on the tide. You can establish the water density with a brewers hydrometer, easily available and not expensive. If you can establish the water density, I can create something for you, perhaps a spreadsheet that will make it easy. Dave Edited February 16, 2020 by Vodkaman 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gliders Posted February 20, 2020 Report Share Posted February 20, 2020 On 2/16/2020 at 4:46 PM, mark poulson said: I bet they'd work on both trout and salmon. Those fish eat other fish, bigtime. Hey Mark,sure they would, our Atlantic salmon stop feeding long before they run our rivers. I did build a few prototypes for pike, maybe get back to them in a few months, I bought a hundred stainless props plus cups ! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark poulson Posted February 22, 2020 Report Share Posted February 22, 2020 On 2/20/2020 at 3:21 PM, gliders said: Hey Mark,sure they would, our Atlantic salmon stop feeding long before they run our rivers. I did build a few prototypes for pike, maybe get back to them in a few months, I bought a hundred stainless props plus cups ! Gliders, salmon are some really strong fish. I caught a 30" plus male salmon here on the CA Delta, on a wiggle wart, and he twisted the rear hook hanger 90 degrees! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hillbilly voodoo Posted February 22, 2020 Report Share Posted February 22, 2020 10 hours ago, mark poulson said: Gliders, salmon are some really strong fish. I caught a 30" plus male salmon here on the CA Delta, on a wiggle wart, and he twisted the rear hook hanger 90 degrees! yup big springs/chinook are good at wrecking lures and burning gears out of reels You may already do this and I know it still can bind at times. A swivel or bead chain is how I limited the abuse on my salmon plugs and spoons. Big springs destroy hook hangers and split rings if they bind them up and roll Not really an issue with other salmon species Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DGagner Posted February 22, 2020 Report Share Posted February 22, 2020 I love this topic. I taught it to 7th graders for a few years. The metric system is cool in that it has standardizations you just can't do easily in the standard system. When talking about water: 1 gram = 1cm3 = 1 ml Water has a density of 1 gram per cubic centimeter. So a 1 cm cube block of water would mass at 1 gram. You can do a lot with this. There are two ways to make something float more. Make it bigger for it's weight, or make it lighter for it's size. Take a 50,000 ton block of steel. It sinks. Shape it into a battleship and it floats. It has nothing to do with the air in it. It's the size. The same block of steel, when made larger will float more in water. It's size has to get larger than it's weight (to put it roughly). If you have a lure that has a mass of 10 grams, and is 10 cm3 in volume, it won't float or sink in water. It will stay at the level it is put at. If you have a lure that has a mass of 10 grams and is 11 cm3 in volume, it will float in water. And sink if the numbers are reversed. Oil has a density less than 1 gram per cm3. So the same lure will sink in it. And of course oil, which seems denser because it appears thicker than water is actually lighter, oil floats on water. This principle causes submarines to work, weather to happen, plate tectonics to occur, computer chips to be made... and a myriad of other things. Things in this universe can be explained by some basic principles you can count on one hand. Density is one of them. Thanks for your indulgence. I retired awhile back but I still have the ability to get long winded in the sciences at the drop of a hat. Ask my kids. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastman03 Posted February 27, 2020 Report Share Posted February 27, 2020 Seriously, blows my mind. haha It seems so obvious when you think about it. But I've never really given this topic much thought. I've never really tried to make a neutrally buoyant lure. Great topic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sailybait Posted January 11, 2022 Report Share Posted January 11, 2022 Hi All, Thank you very much for all the information above. Extremely helpful! I was wondering if anyone would be able to assist me. I wanted to make a resin bait with the same density as paulownia which has a Specific gravity of 0.285. My question is, what percentage by weight of microballoons do I need to add to the resin to achieve this density. I am using smooth cast 300 I understand with this ratio that the mixture will be extremely thick with this level of micros but I have an idea I’d like to test to get it to work. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodkaman Posted January 11, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 11, 2022 The lightest density that I ever achieved was 0.67g/cm³ and the texture was that of English mustard and had to be injected. So, I would say that your paulownia plan is impossible. Dave 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...